Competency to Stand Trial
Current capacity to understand proceedings and assist counsel
Dr. Shafi Lodhi provides competency evaluations, criminal responsibility assessments, sentencing mitigation, and violence risk evaluations, incorporating brain-behavior analysis for cases where traumatic brain injury, neurodevelopmental conditions, or neurocognitive impairment are at issue.
Dr. Lodhi's criminal forensic evaluations are distinguished by his ability to identify and document the neuropsychiatric basis for impaired competency, diminished criminal responsibility, or mitigating neurological factors. His BNNP fellowship training enables him to assess how brain injury, neurocognitive disorders, or neurodevelopmental conditions affect a defendant's understanding, intent, and decision-making: the core questions in competency, NGRI, and mitigation evaluations.
A constitutional requirement (Dusky v. United States, 1960) that the defendant have a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings and sufficient ability to consult with their attorney. Dr. Lodhi evaluates whether conditions such as TBI, dementia, intellectual disability, or psychotic disorders affect the defendant's competency, and provides opinions on competency status, specific functional deficits, and restoration potential.
Assessment of the defendant's mental state at the time of the alleged offense, addressing whether a mental disease or defect prevented understanding the nature and quality of the act or knowing it was wrong. Dr. Lodhi's neuropsychiatric expertise is particularly valuable when brain pathology (rather than purely psychiatric conditions) underlies the defendant's impaired mental state.
In capital and serious felony cases, Dr. Lodhi provides neuropsychiatric mitigation evaluations documenting brain injury, neurodevelopmental disorders, CTE, fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, and other neurological conditions that may warrant sentencing consideration.
Evidence-based evaluation of violence risk using validated actuarial and structured professional judgment instruments, supplemented by neuropsychiatric assessment of brain-based risk factors including executive dysfunction, impulse control impairment, and traumatic brain injury history.
Current capacity to understand proceedings and assist counsel
Mental state at the time of the offense
Inability to form specific intent due to mental condition
Neuropsychiatric factors for sentencing consideration
Brain-based mitigation in death penalty cases
Actuarial and clinical risk evaluation
Miranda waiver, plea competency
Assessment of competency restoration potential
Complimentary case screening for criminal matters involving neuropsychiatric questions.